Court Rules Against Food And Drug Administration Concerning Electronic Cigarettes
The Food and Drug Administration has decided to fight the verdict from the U.S. District Court who ruled they have no jurisdiction concerning the sale of the electronic cigarette. The District Court ruled that as the latest stop smoking apparatus isn’t regarded a medical therapy, the FDA lacks the authority to regulate and control them. The FDA takes issue concerning the District Court’s stand despite the fact they agree electronic cigarettes can actually be beneficial for cigarette smokers wanting to quit cigarettes in the same way methadone helps opiate addicts with their habit.
For anyone not familiar with this new device, it has grown into the trendiest cigarette cessation product since the release of NRT (nicotine renewal treatments). It is a battery run device that was designed to completely mimic a tobacco cigarette. If the user inhales a breath from the unit, it emits a little puff of water vapor that contains nothing but nicotine. They are also refillable as well as rechargeable which makes them much less expensive than tobacco. The best part involving their engineering is the nicotine refills can be bought in various strengths from 50 mg to zero mg nicotine enabling the smoker to gradually over time taper down their nicotine without withdrawal symptoms.
Those that smoke spend upwards of $1.6 billion dollars each year on stopping smoking products and services. Add in the $10 billion annually smokers spend on tobacco and you will see how controlling the ecigarette industry may very well be driven by more than the FDA’s concern for the safety and health concerning United States citizens. Users of the smoke free cigarette consider this ulterior motive and have become a fierce and powerful group who demand the FDA recognize smoke-free cigarettes as a healthier alternative to cigarette smoking. Opposition of the smoke free cigarette, including the ALA (American Lung Association) and Food & Drug Administration, would like them banned until their safety is established.
The FDA has tried in the past to get control of the e smoke. Their initial attempt was noting a presently debunked investigation claiming that the nicotine liquid used to re-fill the e-cig contained unsafe toxins. A report paid for by a large smokefree cigarette vendor has since identified the Food & Drug Administration’s scientific study implemented flawed technological research processes. Now, the ruling against the FDA’s allegation that smoke-free cigarettes are medicinal devices is apparently another nail in the coffin of the Food & Drug Administration’s effort to regulate them.
There are clearly a few unknowns linked to the ecig such as the long-term effects of their use. Though the fact remains, they’re undoubtedly a much better option to using tobacco. Rather than the FDA wasting tens of millions of taxpayer dollars on court costs to acquire control of the electric cigarette, perhaps they ought to begin a thorough research study of their health impact. Assuming, of course, they’re sincerely interested in the overall health of e cig users.
Don’t buy your electronic cigarette before you visit Benson Fontainne’s website. He explains on how to choose electronic cigarettes and supplies that are right for you.
